This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Soapbox stub not edited for over a month. SEWilco 18:11, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete, original research. The giveaway is the use of the first person. Perhaps a use of the second person might baffle us in the future. Tempshill 18:27, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete no references, looks like original research.-Poli (talk • contribs) 23:15, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
Delete original research. Bearcat 15:46, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.