Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina De Lorenzo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted both as vandalism. Dlohcierekim 18:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cristina De Lorenzo

Cristina De Lorenzo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)
Christopher Hirano (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article is self confessed nonsense, but creator contest CSD and wishes to keep the page, see talk page. Triwbe (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. If it were a real novella, I could be tempted to vote keep. However the article says the novella was written in 2008, and the comment on the article talk page says it was written in the 80s. And the page blanking of this AfD hurts the article's case as well, as anti-AGF as that sounds. -- Kéiryn talk 08:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax. I had no luck find sources on dogpile.com and some gems from the article about a character "based on" the author: "every song ever written is allegedly based on her", "Wrote the original draft of the Book of Genesis", "Has caught all 150 original Pokemon. Is still working on the new retarded ones", "A biography was made about her in 1965 based on her best selling memoir "Cristina De Lorenzo: The Uncensored Files". It was retitled "The Greatest Story Ever Told" and was played by Charlton Heston." etc. You should also check out the related article Christopher Hirano. Especially fun in that article's case is the "catch phrase" and where is he now sections... Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 09:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax and as per WP:MADEUP. --Bonadea (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment Can Christopher Hirano be included in this AfD or does it need its own? That article is part of the same hoax as this one. --Bonadea (talk) 09:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment Done. Note edit warring over AFD tags. --Dhartung | Talk 09:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete both If there were any sources, there could be an article. But it looks like this is just made up. --Minimaki (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Both:, fails WP:V and certainly WP:BULLSHIT. Yeesh. And edit warring over AfD tags on this nonsense? That's block-worthy.  RGTraynor  14:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete per WP:NFT and salt due to the action of page creator and his suspected sockpuppets. The proclamations made in this are complete bollocks (wrote the original draft of Genesis, created the Earth with an Easy Bake Oven). This looks like it was madeup by someone while they were bored in school one day. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as hoax. Utter crap. Fictional or not, this is abuse of wikipedia and a waste of everyone's time. Tagged G3. DarkAudit (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete both per nom - total guff. Dreamspy (talk) 18:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.