Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis of 2020 (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 20:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crisis of 2020
This article was nominated for AfD in April 2006 with no consensus. No editing has occurred since then. Even though some people predict this crisis will happen, it's still a crystal ball. YechielMan 18:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I've moved this nomination to a separate page, since the author created the second nomination on the same page as the first. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 18:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete, undue weight given to the work of Strauss and Howe, not a shred of evidence that this idea has achieved widespread notability beyond their works.--Nydas(Talk) 20:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Crystal ball gazing. Rewrite the article when the crisis happens or when there is independent reliable coverage of it. Edison 20:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete pure crystal-ballism, that heavily favors the work of two people.-- danntm T C 21:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete db-context. JuJube 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not as crystal-balling but essentially as a non-notable neologism with no verifiable references other than its original source.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 06:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I always thought it was Crisis of 2101? V-Man737 09:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.