Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cries of animals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep, no firm decision on where to move. Please use the talk page and WP:RM to arrive at a consensus on renaming if this is desired. --Tony SidawayTalk 10:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cries of animals
Marked as a speedy but doesn't fit anything on WP:CSD. I'm tempted to vote delete just so I can say, "WP:NOT a See 'n Say", but in all fairness I think this could be cleaned up into a decent article, after a page move to a better name. No vote, regardless as I'm just fulfilling the original intent of the speedy nominator. Fernando Rizo T/C 11:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- I understand that systems have to be in place to filter out the dross however the correct terms for the cries of animals is an area of interest to many people and one which was heretofore not covered in this valuable resource. <unsigned comment by User:80.43.71.225, the article author>
Either merge with List_of_animal_noises#Animal_sounds, orkeep and rename to Animal sounds. The list can really be quite useful. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)- Comment actually could be quite interesting, but as is article is not good at all... so I'm on the sidelines on this one --Ryan Norton T | @ | C 11:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to List of animal sounds. Since none or very little of these sounds could get their own article, I don't think a category would work. - Mgm|(talk) 13:00, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and remane (to List of animal sounds as per User:MGM), a useful article, surprise that it's nominated. --Commander Keane 13:06, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and rename as per MGM, cleanup, wikify. And cross link with List of animal noises (which should really be a section of onomatopoeia, but there we are). Proto t c 13:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but stipulate that these are the english inturpritation since in Germany, for exampls, cocks do not say "cock-a-doo-da-doo" HoratioVitero 23:37, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.