Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative production

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 06:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Creative production

This transwikified dicdef has been around since August 31, 2002, and has shown no indications of growth since it was created. A previous VfD attempt resulted in no consensus. Delete this overly broad topic, or provide proof of viability by showing meaningful expansion before this article becomes a lasting tribute to the Halting problem. --Allen3 ^talk 12:42, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, this is a renomination after about 6 weeks. Kappa 12:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, if anyone wants to write an article on this the fact that we deleted this dict-def won't hinder them. --W(t) 13:21, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
• Delete it's been a subsubstub dicdef for 3 years now, not likely to change anytime soon. Whatever there is to say about this topic is in other articles like creativity, art, etc. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:22, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Sounds like a pleonasm to me. Delete, replace with redirect to production. Radiant_>|< 15:13, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for the same reasons I gave the last time around: that there's no sign that it's anything but a non-subject, and that the only coherent argument given so far for keeping it is that it could be improved -- while none of the people arguing this has yet bothered to improve it. -- Hoary 15:39, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
• Delete. It hasn't been expanded, and right now it is useless. --Scimitar 15:45, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nearly 3 year old dic def substub showing no signs of growth. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:41, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Carnildo 20:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, stubby dictdef (though the phrase gets surprisingly many google hits; ah well, everything is permitted in PR, I guess). Jitse Niesen 23:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictionary stuff, really. Barely that, I've never heard of this strange term. It sounds like PR nonsense. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:05, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.