Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation vs. Evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. - Mailer Diablo 12:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Creation vs. Evolution

POV fork of Creation-evolution controversy, at best would make sense to be a redirect. JoshuaZ 06:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect or Delete - We don't need two articles of this. I'm actually surprised that we have the other article in the first place. -WarthogDemon 06:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect at best, Delete otherwise. Original research and POV pushing at its finest. Seraphimblade 06:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• I redirected it for now. Deleting is fine as well. POV fork. — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Where exactly has it been moved to? I don't see it on the Creation-evolution controversy page. MAXimum Xtreme 06:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Nothing was moved, it was made a redirect by KnowledgeSeeker. JoshuaZ 06:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Sometimes, MX, some content from a problematic article can be merged into an existing article. People may express such an opinion here, or may carry out the merge themselves. In this case, it is unlikely that anything from the article in question would be considered suitable for inclusion. I would also suggest that if this trend continues, this discussion be closed as per WP:SNOW, and to avoid excessive criticism of this article. I naturally won’t do it, having participated in the discussion already. — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Michael Johnson 08:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbusto 08:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, POV fork. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 10:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Creation-Evolution controversy inaccurate POV rubbish Hut 8.5 15:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, which has already been done.--Isotope23 16:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• I reverted the redirect since folks like to see what they !vote on. In any case, my !vote is Smite. ~ trialsanderrors 17:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect completely POV and a much better article already exists. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Beyond POV and riddled with errors. I appreciate trialsanderrors's reasoning, but as articles are "live," so to speak, if this isn't a redirect we should have something at the top of the page directing readers to our established article on this topic. JChap2007 01:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect. If someone searches for "Creation vs. Evolution" they are almost certainly looking for Creation-evolution controversy. SWAdair 08:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.