Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreateWindow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 18:27, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] CreateWindow and CreateWindowEx
Wikipedia is not a programming manual. Detailed technical details of the Windows API, such as detailed discussions of individual functions, do not belong, unless what the function does is particularly fascinating. (Drawing a window on the screen is not particularly fascinating nowadays.)
- Nomination by 137.111.13.34
- Concur, Delete. Radiant_* 13:33, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Move if possible. Isn't there a Wikibook on the Windows API that these could be transferred to (I didn't find one), or should someone start one? (I'm not familiar enough with Wikibooks yet to know I wouldn't be duplicating an existing manual.) --Unfocused 03:27, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it's called MSDN.com :) Radiant_* 08:28, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- MSDN is far too convoluted. Besides, it's not a wiki. We should have somewhere to put this stuff. But we can't have all of the Win32 API functions on the primary Wikipedia - there are hundreds of them. Firebug 19:51, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Also, MSDN is non-free. Further, I wouldn't trust Microsoft to ever fully disclose their API in public, so I thought a Wiki would be a pretty appropriate place to find such a reference. --Unfocused 20:07, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry, that remark wasn't entirely serious. We could plausibly have a Microsoft wikibook, I just hope their lawyers'd stay away. Radiant_* 07:53, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
- As long as the info wasn't directly copied from MSDN (which I think this may have been) then I don't see what grounds for complaint MS could have. Firebug 14:45, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry, that remark wasn't entirely serious. We could plausibly have a Microsoft wikibook, I just hope their lawyers'd stay away. Radiant_* 07:53, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Also, MSDN is non-free. Further, I wouldn't trust Microsoft to ever fully disclose their API in public, so I thought a Wiki would be a pretty appropriate place to find such a reference. --Unfocused 20:07, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- MSDN is far too convoluted. Besides, it's not a wiki. We should have somewhere to put this stuff. But we can't have all of the Win32 API functions on the primary Wikipedia - there are hundreds of them. Firebug 19:51, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it's called MSDN.com :) Radiant_* 08:28, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a programming manual, and I suspect that it's a copyvio from MSDN. --Carnildo 20:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a manual.
- Delete. Quale 05:48, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Shanes 05:51, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for Copyvio: text is identical to MSDN. (Otherwise I'd say move to Wikibooks.) Krubo 12:57, 2005 May 14 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
