Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crapsized

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Crapsized

Didn't warrant a yahoo! search. Stupid article --Dangherous 22:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Nonsense.  (aeropagitica)  22:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 5 google hits, including this RfD page (Nonsense/neologism) - Trysha ^(talk) 22:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as uncommon neologism. Sycthos^Talk 23:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• This isn't even a neologism. This is a protologism. A Google Web search turns up one person coining this word as a protologism, but with a completely different meaning. I can find no uses of this word with this meaning at all. An encyclopaedia article would be about the concept of crapsizing, were such a concept to exist, and that would be where this article ought to be renamed, per our Wikipedia:Naming conventions (verbs), in such a case. The concept doesn't exist. This is original research. Delete. Uncle G 05:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. Incognito 20:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.