Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craigdownings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-08 09:55Z

[edit] Craigdownings

Craigdownings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability per WP:LOCAL, article is also unsourced. No google hits to yield any information either. Arkyan • ^(talk) 19:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete fails notability guidelines and would be very tough to properly source. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 19:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Seed 2.0 20:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. Acalamari 23:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia is full of articles on villages in America with 2, or 1, or even 0 inhabitants - places like Craigdownings. Why delete this? Keeno 09:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.