Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig M. Johnson

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:16, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Craig M. Johnson

Seems to be a very biographical entry and one that is barely confirmed by Internet sources (I got 4 hits on Google). I would suggest userfy, except that the primary editor (the only editor) hasn't created a user. So I'm voting delete as per WP:NOT Kel-nage 23:30, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Definitely delete. Totally non notable and (auto?)biographical. Evolver 23:35, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, probable vanity. android79 23:36, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete under A7 since no notability is asserted. This is autobiography; the author should userfy the info if he wishes to create an account. Dottore So 23:38, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn. Maybe speedy, but a couple statements, could maybe, just maybe, be seen as a claim of notability, however week. --rob 23:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

I respectfully dispute that. Doing your job as an architect is not an assertion of notability. If he'd won an award or co-designed with someone of note, maybe that would count. But there is nothing here that crosses the threshhold. I think it should be speedied. Dottore So 23:52, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Here's the assertions that consitute a claim of notability:

• Vice-President of national company (not just archetect)
• "he also designed several notable retail centers in..."
• "He currently manages the retail division of the Orange County Nadel Architects..."

Those are claims. Poor claims. Bad claims. Claims I reject. But claims. --rob 00:01, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nonverifiable, per rob. Agree that speedy is inappropriate because article contains claims of notability. -- Creidieki 04:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under A7. Martg76 07:39, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nn vanity.---CH (talk) 02:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete original research G Clark 02:19, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.