Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cragg Chaffee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, doesn't assert notability, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cragg Chaffee

Cragg Chaffee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

A quick google search does not turn up anything but a frat boy, which is who I suspect this is. Aiden Fisher (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Looks like political spam. Not notable unless and until he actually wins. -- Dougie WII (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually this is probably more likely just a hoax page. -- Dougie WII (talk) 04:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Cragg Chaffee is a legitimate candidate with both the executive and military background to be considered as so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.228.128.156 (talk) 04:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you please give us a reference for this. Aiden Fisher (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

http://spectrum.buffalo.edu/article.php?id=32850 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.228.128.156 (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't see how this article asserts his notability. It tells us where he works and his star sign, but not why he's worthy of inclusion in the 'pedia. Xdenizen (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps he is. Be aware that just being a "legitimate candidate", even for offices higher than this one, is not sufficient notability for a Wikipedia biography. --Dhartung | Talk 05:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete -- as per nom. Not a notable individual. I considered tagging this for speedy deletion when I noticed it on New Pages, but figured it would end up here where the community could comment. Xdenizen (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--RyRy5 ^{Talk to RyRy} 04:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - article makes me smile. No notability to WP:BIO, so delete. SunCreator (talk) 04:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Non notable Beidabaozi (talk) 05:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Minkythecat (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Either this is completely a WP:HOAX, or the Republicans are in even deeper trouble this year than anybody thinks. Qworty (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, by the looks of it, an amusing but non-notable joke candidate. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC).
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete This is a joke article about a joke candidate. DarkAudit (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Article content makes it look like a definite hoax. Also, article creator is an SPA. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 20:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, as an obvious hoax, also fails WP:BIO. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.