Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowschwitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (closed by non-admin). RMHED (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cowschwitz

Cowschwitz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An unencyclopedic take on a non-notable cattle ranch — AjaxSmack 20:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

• While the actual company itself might (emphasis on "might") be notable, to say that "Cowschwitz" is a regularly used name for it is incorrect - 600 or so Google results, and no erally reliable sources to back it up. Delete - frankly, it might even be considered an attack page. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

• Looks better, but I'd like to see some more sourcing. Weak keep Tony Fox (arf!) 06:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as nn. The actual Ranch doesn't have an article (or I can't find it?) If it does redirect to it. Sting au Buzz Me... 23:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Article was moved to a better name and the POV issues addressed. So the reasons provided for deleting no longer appear to be valid. A few more references and this should be clearly notable. I'll see if I can find some. I'm sure the smell is well reported. Changed from weak since they supply the In-N-Out chain with their hamburger meet. That is notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as fixed per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as notable. changed my vote per Vegaswikian's efforts. Sting au Buzz Me... 07:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete One promotional bit, one bit from their website and some radio is hardly some indepth coverage from third party sources. It is some random cattle ranch. Yes it is big. That just makes it one big cattle ranch. Narson (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep At 100,000 cattle, it's practically a geographical feature. DGG (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep with the caveat that I would still like to see more sources, of course. I had concerns about the neutrality of the article, especially about the previous name of the article; I didn't doubt that that nickname was used, especially after reading copious blog entries , but I couldn't see a neutral article developing at that title. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Harris Ranch beef is marketed over a wide area. My supermarket (over 100 miles away) carries a wide selection of Harris Ranch products. I wish the article were of higher quality and more complete; I'd love to know more about the origins of my food. Stepheng3 (talk) 01:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.