Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cow cuddling

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete (already copied to BJAODN) --Allen3 ^talk July 7, 2005 01:20 (UTC)

[edit] Cow cuddling

Not notable and pretty much nonsensical. KFP 28 June 2005 18:02 (UTC)

• Patent nonsense, belongs to BJAODN. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 28 June 2005 18:53 (UTC)
• BJAODN - raised a smile with me. Nonsense, clearly. Naturenet | Talk 28 June 2005 19:20 (UTC)
• Delete. Badly translated, nonsensical textDunemaire 28 June 2005 19:23 (UTC)
• Speedy BJAODN. -- BD2412 ^talk June 28, 2005 20:13 (UTC)
• BJAODN. --Carnildo 28 June 2005 20:33 (UTC)
• Speedy delete to BJAODN as funny patent nonsense. --Idont Havaname 28 June 2005 23:22 (UTC)

*BJAODN as non notable- but I don't think it can be speedy deleted because patent nonsense either has no meaning or can't be understood. We can understand what's being described in that article even if we want no part in it. CanadianCaesar 29 June 2005 01:57 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. - Sikon 29 June 2005 04:20 (UTC)
• Moooooooove this to BJAODN. Hilarious. JamesBurns 29 June 2005 05:41 (UTC)
• Keep It's more legit now. Oneoftheweirdosthatstarteditall
• On second thought, move to BJAODN. mrWoot
• Keep Check out those links, looks real to me! Who knew?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.