Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, since the proposed target article has a different subject. Kusma (討論) 01:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)

There is already an article "Court of Final Appeal" for the same subject matter. If you want to move the article to another title, discuss in the discussion page. Alan 21:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I think I was confused by the recent cut-and-paste move in the article "Court of Final Appeal". The "court of appeal" and the "court of final appeal" are two different courts. Anyway, this article is too short. Should it be cayegories into "Hong Kong stub" or should it be merged into another article? - Alan 21:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I think I see. Move to The Court of Appeal of the High Court. It is short, but stubs aren't prohibited. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 21:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect ---|Newyorktimescrossword 02:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)|
  • Comment: User:Alanmak had withdrawn this AfD nomination hadn't he? If that's not the case, count this mine as a keep vote. IMHO it doesn't have to be moved. — Instantnood 19:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC) (modified 18:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC))
    • Comment'. That's not possible, as there have already been nonvotes that aren't keep. --Rory096 21:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. Stifle (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.