Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Couples on The Simpsons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Couples on The Simpsons
Really not necessary. It's trivial cruft and incomplete. -- Scorpion 13:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into List of characters from The Simpsons DXRAW 13:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wait a minute here... You reverted my edits where I merged this page into another page just so you could restore this AFD and vote for a merge? -- Scorpion 13:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I quote "but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed." DXRAW 13:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- And you did not merge the info into the page you just did a redirect. DXRAW 13:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I quote "but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed." DXRAW 13:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Delete. Unnecessary, trivial and incomplete. --Maitch 15:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Pointless fanlistcruft. Bereft of WP:FICT's "real-world context and sourced analysis". -- IslaySolomon | talk 15:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as being really quite indiscriminate. Ohconfucius 16:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is already included in the individual character's page, and the cross references to other articles would make more sense there. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by SkierRMH (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 January 2007
- Delete Unnecessary and redundant. 23skidoo 00:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Cruft-tastic. Natalie 03:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
