Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter Strike 1.6 Guide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Counter Strike 1.6 Guide

Delete per guidelines: Wikipedia is not the place for tutorials, manuals and how-tos Lurker ^talk 10:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator. Tonywalton  | Talk 10:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Jll 11:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Mets501 (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator Park3r 13:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I wish the contributing editors nothing but the best, and thank them for their efforts, but that's not the sort of content we're looking for. Luna Santin 13:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per clause 8 of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --TheFarix (Talk) 14:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 15:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The clearest case of game guide I've ever seen. Ace of Sevens 15:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Gogo Dodo 00:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. We're not GameFAQs. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ace of Sevens. It even has the word "guide" in its title. ;) RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 01:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I think that covers it. Tell the guy to move it to Wikibooks or something if he gets angry.--Planetary 08:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Woah, a game guide AFD for an article that's actually a game guide! -- gakon5 15:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Stellmach 16:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Wow. Universal deletion! If only things were that simple elswhere.--Planetary 19:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Combination 14:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't even pretend to be an encyclopedia article. AMHR285 ^(talk) 06:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.