Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Mospak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Count Mospak

Count Mospak (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Hmm. I can't find any reference whatsoever to this title on Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, or the entire historical archive of Google News. Is it WP:HOAX? It certainly appears to be WP:AUTO and WP:COI and WP:Single-purpose account, and there are no WP:RS of any sort. Without any indication that this both exists and is notable, there isn't any option but to delete. Qworty (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete This is clearly a hoax --Adamfinmo (talk) 08:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom - obvious hoax. Dreamspy (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, I guess I missed your knighting Andrew! Here you have it, You are a spoof!! By the way, Roman did well in writing your article and best regards, see you in Poland. S —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graf stefan (talk • contribs) 00:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC) — Graf stefan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • This is far from a hoax as some have noted. Orthodox titles as well as "land grants" of historical lands as well as current are in our time awarded and recorded by proper agents of office. Perhaps each who question His Grace would like to offer proof of their patents?Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Count_Mospak" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mospak (talk • contribs) 00:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC) — Mospak (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • I think the responsibility lies with 'His Grace' to provide proof that his title actually exists, which this article doesn't so far. Delete unless actual references to reliable sources are provided. Terraxos (talk) 04:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

It is fair to ask and seek what is true. It is something else to take away One's honors that have been earned. The proper links to His Holiness are included in said article. To take away from what this great office has added remains nothing short of insult. Again, provide your patents or drop your pointless insults.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Count_Mospak" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mospak (talk • contribs) 00:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

His Grace has nothing to do with those companies. Infact, He resides in the U.S. What he is asking for is you the reader to 1) write to the Holy Bishop so that the Bishop will confirm his corination and 2) show your letter of patent as frankly unless you are a member of nobility you have no idea what you are speaking of. I say this with respect and no harsh tone. Best regards and truely, contact Mar Frederick, His Grace simply wants to help others and his web site is under way. S —Preceding unsigned comment added by Graf stefan (talk • contribs) 01:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - hoax. No WP:RS - none of the links provide any confirmation. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Obvious hoax, which the links do not support. Edward321 (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.