The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page☎ ) 23:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Borderline one this, for me. Poor yahoo! search engine test results. --Dangherous 22:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete No printed citation to refer to as a word - poss. neologism but still needs citation. (aeropagitica) 22:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete agree with above - Trysha(talk) 22:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
There appear to be enough sources dealing with the subject for an encyclopaedia article to be written. Keep. Uncle G 06:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.