Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmopolitan Revival

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 04:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cosmopolitan Revival

Cosmopolitan Revival (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Another bizarre article from multiple sockpuppeteer User:Webb Traverse. Prod removed by suspected sock of same, so AFD by procedure. Original reason for prod was "Term and article seem to be original research. This term is not used anywhere in the refs and gets few Google hits, none of which are useful." I tend to agree. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete even assuming good faith, it's a non notable neologism. --Dweller (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Textbook neologism; a bunch of stuff happened, and now someone is trying to unify it under a label here. None of the sources in any way support this term.--Isotope23 talk 16:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Term appears to be made up by User:Webb Traverse. None of the sources cited in the article use this term. Original research attempt to coin a phrase. Wickethewok (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Without even looking at the article itself, would it be eligible for Speedy G5 Banned User? --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 22:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Reply to self No, he created the article before he got banned. Still, Delete. All ghits that do not lead to Wikipedia articles lead to definitions of the term that have nothing to do with what Webb Traverse wrote. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 23:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.