Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic twin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and then redirect to soulmate.  Sandstein  20:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cosmic twin

Cosmic twin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No demonstration of notability at all: neither of the two external links provided makes any mention at all of the term "cosmic twin". The Anome (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - appears to be original research. Aleta ^Sing 03:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Aleta ^Sing 03:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to soulmate. The term is in use, or has been (I suspect it's in decline), but there aren't enough substantial sources about it for more than a mention in that article. --Dhartung | Talk 06:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, no sources. Redirect if appropriate. WillOakland (talk) 07:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like OR. -- Alexf⁴² 03:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
• redirect per Dhartung above. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.