Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Variance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 01:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cosmic Variance

A non-notable blog by five people, none of which are anywhere near notable enough to have their own wikipedia entry in the first place. Be careful trying to use google to justify this article, as 'cosmic variance' is a general term. Proto t c 16:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all blogcruft advertising. Proto t c 16:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - huge brick of crap. -- Femmina 17:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nom. Incognito 17:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Blogcruftus Maximus WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 20:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete $blog is about $topic by $writer. Do we need to include every one of them in wikipedia? no. --Timecop 23:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per timecop. Hosterweis 00:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable weblog. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 03:12Z
• Delete Per Above --Depakote 15:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment-- 3 or so of the 5 people would seem to qualify for inclusion under WP:BIO The professor test (well-published, Stanford, USC, U Chicago), even if their blog doesn't. MayerG 08:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 07:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.