Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmetic democracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cosmetic democracy

Prod removed and replaced with a {NPOV} tag, but I think the problems here run a lot deeper. Basically a POV, OR essay about why some countries are not really democracies (example: Mexico is only a "cosmetic democracy" because one party dominated for 70 years before Vicente Fox was elected.) At best, this would be an article about a Neologism, but I don't see it as salvageable. All you can say is that some people think Country X is a Cosmetic Democracy. Fan-1967 13:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, WP:NOR, WP:NEO, article is full of rubbish. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 14:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as well as being a neologism, the concept it is talking about can never be anything other than POV. JPD (talk) 17:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOR, WP:NEO -Markeer 17:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• You can delineate problems with a democracy-- Freedom House does so in a verifiable and somewhat NPOV manner -- but you can't use Wikipedia to evaluate those results. Once you do that you're doing originial research. Buh bye. Alba 11:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.