Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosby-Pokémon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was killed.--SB | T 04:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cosby-Pokémon

Blatant ad for a site less than a week old. Prod was removed by page creator without comment. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC) Aaaaand now it's an equally unencyclopedic stub about a YTMND meme. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong delete per nom. Ryūlóng 01:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Super strong delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB. SynergeticMaggot 01:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per nom and SynergeticMaggot. Acyso 01:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Per nominations. *~Daniel~* ☎ 01:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't know if it's a speedy, but should be deleted anyway. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 01:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB -- Alias Flood 01:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unfortunately, there is no speedy criteria satisfied by this article. It's obviously vanity, obviously a failure of WP:WEB. alphaChimp laudare 01:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete speedily if at all possible. A week-old web fansite cannot possibly be considered notable. The author didn't even include a link, and it isn't in Google yet, so I can't even look at the site to comment on its tiny userbase and lack of Alexa rating. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not quite a speedy candidate unless it gets crammed into criteria A1, but I don't think that fits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom AdamBiswanger1 02:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above abakharev 04:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.