Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cortado (software)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus (default keep). — Scientizzle 15:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cortado (software)

Cortado (software) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pitifully short. The only reason why I'm not A7ing it is because WM uses it. Will (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep, shortness itself is not necessarily grounds for deletion. If WM (which I presume means WikiMedia) uses it, then it's possibly notable. Tag for expansion instead. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  • It shalt live on if it be expanded ...eth - like I said. Jake the Editor Man 13:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, this is currently Wikipedia's default media player, and in addition it is likely to be externally notable. --MaTrIx 07:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, single-line substub which has remained so for some time. No prejudice against recreating a proper article. Stifle (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Will: this stub is too short to assert notability. --Gavin Collins 21:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • strong keep. this software is being used in wikipedia. example Buzz Aldrin. every short article should not be deleted but EXPANDED. if you start deleting articles about GPL/GNU softwares that are being used in wikiepedia, then may god help you and wikipedia.Preetikapoor0 08:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Very Strong Keep/Expand - for the same reason as in the Mzoli's Meats controversy, ALL ARTICLES HAVE TO START OFF SOMEWHERE YOU KNOW. ViperSnake151 02:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.