Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corrin Brooks-Meade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 02:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corrin Brooks-Meade

Corrin Brooks-Meade (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested speedy and prod. The reasoning however remains the same, this player is yet to make an appearance in a fully professional league and fails WP:BIO. Nuttah68 18:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment - I agree that subject doesn't satisfy the professional league requirement under WP:BIO since Football League Two is semi-professional, but he appears to have a substantial number of mentions in secondary source material. --Sesameball^Talk 20:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment. League two is fully professional, however, this player has never played at that level. Nuttah68 20:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment Ah, I thought he actually played a game for Darlington. --Sesameball^Talk 20:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete: Yes, it fails WP:BIO, does not have enough sources, but i still think it can be expanded and turned into a good article, but like i said it fails BIO, so. Tiptoety 23:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 10:03, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Has not played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Peanut4 10:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per "the same old history concerning WP:BIO". --Angelo 11:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - no appearances at all for either Fulham F.C. or Darlington F.C., also his loan spell is due to expire in November. May only be emergency cover for first/second choice keepers. Ref ^(chew)(do) 15:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.