Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Correct answer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Correct answer

Correct answer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod, not by me. Despite the general title, this is a controversial essay about a program at one particular school. It would be better to redirect to 42 (number), if not delete. Considering the possibility of mischief with this name, perhaps salting should be considered. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 05:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as WP:COATRACK. Apparently just a POV fork from reform mathematics. --Dhartung | Talk 05:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete essay. And nonsense in some places, too, probably arising from peculiarities of American education system and inherent confusion between mathematics and application of mathematics. (irrelevant opinion stricken out by author). `'Míkka>t 06:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as POV essay. It would be difficult to expand an article with this title past a dictionary definition that a correct answer is an answer that is correct (or words to that effect). Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, an unsalvagable POV rant. Lankiveil (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete As above. If you get rid of the POV essay there's nothing left. Alberon (talk) 10:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and the title makes no sense 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge salvageable information into Mathematically Correct. -- Dominus (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Paul August ☎ 03:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.