Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corner Pocket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete CSD G7 author's request. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 11:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Corner Pocket

This webcomic, seen here with 11 forum members, no assertion of notability and no Alexa rank. "Corner Pocket" "Dylan Evans" on generates 6 Google hits. (Dylan Evans being the author). - Hahnchen 23:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 03:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no non-trivial secondary sources, no assertion of notability. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 03:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No Alexa rank, one google result. Bradcis 04:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. We already went through a deletion battle, and won. The reason the site doesn't have many forum members is due to the fact that it's a 2006 comic. SugarFLY 03:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What do you mean by "won"? If a deletion survives a speedy delete nomination, it can still go through the AfD process. Please read notability criteria for web sites, verifiability, reliable sources (as this is an encyclopedia, which is a tertiary source). The article does not meet any of these criteria, and Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information. It's also not a place for you to advertise your webcomic. ColourBurst 05:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above deletion arguments. Notability can't be proven. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per ColourBurst. Resolute 05:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Fine then, go ahead. Delete it. Just know that I am taking this to heart.SugarFLY 05:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• I'm sorry for reacting so harshly. This comic is my life, and wikipedia is the only place I was getting hits from. You can't blame me for trying. Nevertheless, please remove this article. I'd rather not associate my work with asenine elitists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SugarFLY (talk • contribs) 2006-08-27 06:03:40
  • If you came to Wikipedia in order to "get hits", then you came here for the wrong reasons. You didn't come here to write an encyclopaedia article; you can here to write an advertisement. Wikipedia is not an advertising billboard. Uncle G 11:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per creator request. Also, to the above user please read WP:Civil and WP:NPA. Thank you. I will put a speedy deletion tag on this article.--Jersey Devil 08:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, extremelly obscure, probably vanity. --Mecanismo | Talk 11:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.