Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corner Penthouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Corner Penthouse

I prodded this article, but the its authors contested it on its talk page, so I'm moving this here. The only evidence I can find this comic exists is this article, so fails WP:V. It appears to have been written by one of the comic's authors as well, so also has WP:VANITY problems. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 03:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 03:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Honestly, I agree with all the arguements for deletion on the talk page. Googling "Corner Penthouse comic" gives nothing and "Corner Penthouse" comic gives this article. It may have a "small cult following" in one tiny secluded section of the world (or in one tiny section of Toronto), but that's a far cry from notability. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing significant about yet another webcomic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.224.208 (talk • contribs)
• Delete If it's not published, then it's neither notable nor verifiable. Kevin 06:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 07:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, cruft, non-notable, unverifiable and probably several other things too. Just zis Guy you know? 13:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per allof the above. -- Dragonfiend 17:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.