Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CorneliOS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CorneliOS
- CorneliOS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
- Image:CorneliOS-screen.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFY, no assertion of notability Jackaranga 16:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment (not voting) I swear this looks familiar, has this been up for delete before? If so, that needs to be disclosed. Pharmboy 17:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- It doesn't say it has on the talk page, and the page as never been deleted before, so I'm guessing no. Unless someone forgot to put the tag on the talk page last time, but I doubt it.Jackaranga 17:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- The article could have been deleted last week, and the history would not show up except to the admins. That is the kind of issue I am asking about. I can check the history myself, but not if it was deleting before. Pharmboy 22:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what you personaly know how to do, but normal users have the possibility of looking at the page's deletion log, go to the page click the history tab, then click the link that says "View logs for this page", then if you like you can also sort the logs using the drop down menu, but in this case the log is empty anyway so there is no point doing so.Jackaranga 11:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- The article could have been deleted last week, and the history would not show up except to the admins. That is the kind of issue I am asking about. I can check the history myself, but not if it was deleting before. Pharmboy 22:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't say it has on the talk page, and the page as never been deleted before, so I'm guessing no. Unless someone forgot to put the tag on the talk page last time, but I doubt it.Jackaranga 17:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Checking, I see no deleted edits. It's a contested prod from July 27. I have not however looked at name variations, as I do not know what would be likely. DGG (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, article should first be targeted for improvement. Ubernostrum 18:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sources are found to establish notability Corpx 04:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete search finds no reliable sources. While it sounds like an interesting project, that's not enough by itself. JulesH 11:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 13:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:N. Google did not help. Carlosguitar 01:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, this seems like a major project — 76.233.54.182 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
