Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cork Street

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The article makes no assertion of its own notability and has nothing to suggest it is notable even within the art world. Although the discussion suggests notability, not one single WP:RS has been added or demonstrated. Article can be re-created when these are found and added. --JodyB yak, yak, yak 20:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cork Street

Cork Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

As with everything else I'm dredging up whilst cleaning up Category:Streets in London, sending it to AfD instead of prodding as named geographic locations are always contentious. This one's been up for a year now & I don't see how it's rescuable (although happy to be persuaded) — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Not really a notable street.--JForget 01:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per lack of notability. It'll be directory level to have pages for every street out there Corpx 05:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep — this is one of the most notable London streets in the art world since it largely consists of contemporary art galleries. Notice its range of categories. Do any art experts here disagree? — Jonathan Bowen 14:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep — per above, but article needs to be expanded to be worthwhile. Kbthompson 15:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but expand. -- Roleplayer 00:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as very notable. Lots of RS's can be found, I am sure. Bearian 02:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP not being a directory, but I'm open to changing this !vote if someone has a different interpretation of WP:NOT. ColdmachineTalk 06:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - per above, especially Jonathan Bowen. Very notable in the art world. --Oakshade 19:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It has nice galleries, but notability, none. --Gavin Collins 10:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.