Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copying

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 18:33, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Copying

Dictionary definition. TigerShark 00:32, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep & Expand. Copying has a particular significance in intellectual property law, where a number of cases have refined the question of what exactly constitutes the kind of copying prohibited by law. Just dropped that in this article, too. -- 8^D ^gab 01:19, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
• Keep, good point BD2412. Kappa 06:45, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Short, but longer than the first like dic def. Also possible to expand. Mgm|^(talk) 10:14, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Well done BD 2412. Appears to have potential for expansion on significant cases in intellectual property law. Capitalistroadster 02:35, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but consider merging to copyright - or setting up a disambig. Radiant_* 13:57, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - needs heavy expansion if to be kept. --maru 00:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; consider a merge of the IP issues involed to copyright. Josh 04:19, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Considering exactly such a merger - will get to it in about a week. -- 8^D ^gab 21:33, 2005 Apr 22 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.