Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CooperYoung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 19:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CooperYoung

A board game invented by a university student, only ever played by him and his friends, then abandoned. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Percy Snoodle 14:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete per nom. Tevildo 14:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom/nn.--Andeh 16:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Ed (Edgar181) 17:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Almost Interesting. Wouldn't want to be the referee though. "No. no. no. no. no. no. no. yes! Anyone fancy a pint? I'm gasping." Deizio talk 22:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It IS a clever idea isn't it? I just got the really clever bit. Deizio talk 02:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Feel free to enlighten us at some point. --DaveG12345 02:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete like Deizio I find this sort of interesting, but that's not a reason to keep the article while the impossibility of verifying it plus the crystalballism and lack of notability are good reasons not to. WP:NFT is a bit harsh. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm tempted to say merge with Luke Pebody, which is awash with unverified information, with a busy discussion page - looks like Luke himself was once up for the chop. Virtually everything on the internet about the guy game is the verbatim text from the WP article. Weak Delete for now. The game is pretty unremarkable though (sounds a chore to play), so this will likely be upgraded. --DaveG12345 02:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not for non-notable, crystallized things made up in school one day. --Coredesat talk 08:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.