Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool bounce

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:36, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cool bounce

Non notable neologism. Delete. - Marcika 17:29, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(Note: this VfD page was then blanked by User:65.82.170.79, the creator of the "cool bounce" article, who also removed the VfD notice from the article itself.) -- The Anome 20:06, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

The same user has come back, and replaced the whole text with the message "Not worth this. Delete it. -- Author". Then somebody (possibly the same person, but using a different IP) came back and changed it twice, first to blank out the previous message, then to link WP:bite. I think somebody's feelings have been hurt! ---Isaac R 04:07, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Not notable. Delete. -- The Anome 20:06, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I mean, duh, it's a word coined in the last 4 months by a 5-year-old (according to the article). Isn't this a candidate for speedy deletion? ---Isaac R 22:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 03:52, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Master Thief Garrett 11:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Neologism Dsmdgold 14:45, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Zscout370 22:48, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It may be cool, but it's really neologism. Zzyzx11 | Talk 22:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. The article has been tagged as speedy since the original author has now requested it to be deleted. [1] Zzyzx11 | Talk 22:58, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.