Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CookSwing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as not notable software. --Selket ^Talk 04:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CookSwing

CookSwing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

It's semi-promotional, but that could be fixed if it were notable. I find no evidence of RS coverage of this Java library and ghits are forums, blogs and other non-reliable sources. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 13:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks promotional to me, hardly an encyclopedic article, just a list of features. Rehevkor (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Keep this, and keep similar stuff as long as they are open source and/or seem to be used by a user base. There already are much stuff of the same nature here, even comparisons, competitions among them elsewhere (xul alliance). I find wikipedia references useful. The way these things are presented in Wikipadia is refreshingly different from sales material. If you want to criticise, point to its insignificance write a few sentences or add a link for a proper page for the purpose. Assumed (not registered) user name:SSSSS, 22:35, 01 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.164.3.157 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Singularity 07:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Definitely non-notable. Doesn't have to reliable sources needed to provide verification that it needs in order to have an article here. Just a list of features; not really a real article. Razorflame 23:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.