Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooble

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speediliy deleted as vandalism Dlohcierekim Deleted?

[edit] Cooble

Cooble (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Probably hoax, no sources given fschoenm (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete as nonsense. Kafka Liz (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - first and foremost, it has to be a hoax. No hits anywhere for the term or the supposed person it's named after. This was amusing, though.--Gwynand (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as disruptive vandalism.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as bull. Nice sign, though. --UsaSatsui (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Do not Delete as FrEaK40 - Sources Pending, please give requested time. —Preceding comment was added at 20:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - hoax. Contributor above is an SPA editing only on this and Arthur D. Cooble. JohnCD (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

my account is not a SPA, these are just my first arcticles of many more to come —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrPlow09 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment BobSmith25 (talk · contribs) has removed the AfD notice from both articles. At time of writing, they are his only edits. JuJube (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Due to lack of references and persistance vandalism on the site I have decided to remove both sites.

  • Speedy delete G3, as blatant and obvious misinformation. Deor (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I tried both "Cooble measurement" and "Cooble distance" neither turned up, any relevant reliable pages. I would also like to Assume good faith on the creator's part. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 00:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, G3 Obvious hoax. And some pretty serious sockpuppetry going on. Blueboy96 02:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Definite hoax. — Wenli (reply here) 03:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.