Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversational publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conversational publishing

Non-notable neologism (WP:NEO) that gets all of 56 Google hits – few indeed for an Internet-related concept. The only source cited is a blog. Contested PROD. Sandstein 12:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• New citations and references have been added to validate concept. Reference to original blog has been replaced with more credible sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.137.185 (talk • contribs)
• The notability of this concept is still not proven. One source is a web-published interview that mentions the term once in passing, another source is a blog, and the third source doesn't even mention the term. Sandstein 14:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with nom that the sources now in the article do not qualify as non-trivial coverage by "credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" per WP:V. And with only 13 unique GHits excluding "Wikipedia", I was unable to locate any. As such, article should be deleted and resubmitted only if and when it achieves verifiable wide use as required by WP:NEO#Reliable sources for neologisms. -- Satori Son 18:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - NN Neologism. BlueValour 00:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.