Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control Monger (3 nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptre (Talk) 08:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Control Monger

Relisting per WP:DRV. It was deleted, recreated, speedily deleted as recreated, the last deletion being contested claiming significant expansion. `'mikka (t) 22:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete nn compute game.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. No good reason for deletion given. For great justice. 03:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. --Khoikhoi 06:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - No reason to delete. --Irishpunktom\talk 11:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable, as it was last time round. A free-download game, padded out with "similar to" and all sources are non-reliable; no evidence of numbers of players, innovation or non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Contains speculation: "Now in 2006 all three of the expansions and the full client are now offered as a free download. NetCharger and Mindsurge Entertainment have plans to turn control monger into a MMOFPS in 2007 but there in no information on that at this time." Freely downloadable games are almost never notable, and this shows no evidence of being any different. Just zis Guy you know? 14:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Why is whether or not it is free relevant at all? Why would you make whether someone has to pay for something a criteria? Linus anyone? Oh, not notable! It's free!? For great justice. 18:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep deleted it's still a non-notable game. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Suggest a notability standard for (modern) computer games: if it doesn't have a review on GameSpot, it's not notable. I also notice that the game has only six user reviews on GameSpot. Not likely there are many people playing this. Powers 15:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • keep please no reason to erase this Yuckfoo 07:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. nonverifiable notability. `'mikka (t) 19:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.