Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contributions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 15:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Contributions
Delete. Non-notable band and person. Possibly a vanity page. Only 3 pages link to this page. 1 is Wikipedia:Unusual articles, and the other 2 are words that may have be mistakenly linked to this article, which has nothing to do with the subject in the article. Ibn Abihi 22:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps delete, but certainly rename and move. As you can see from this link, this seems to be real, and there's enough links that maybe he is notable. It's kind of hard to tell if they are all linking to the right guy. But in any case, as far as I can tell, "Contributions" has nothing to do with this dude. --Deville (Talk) 23:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, notable if this is true. However, rename to Karl Schröder and cleanup, of course. Sandstein 06:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - links withstanding, I don't see how they total to notability imo. Wickethewok 09:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This seems a strong delete, I'm afraid. There is another Karl Schröder, also a musician (cellist, d. 1935), to whom most of the websites are devoted. A geocities homepage most emphatically is not a reliable, acceptable reference, unfortunately. While inclusion guidelines can help in deciding the most appropriate disposition of material in the encyclopedia, please note that such considerations only come after the fundamental article space policies are met, ie WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:C, WP:NOT, and supporting rules, eg. WP:RS. If there are few or no appropriate sources, the article cannot be written; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedic articles cannot be written sans sources. —Encephalon 12:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.