Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Context speaking budgies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete all. Flowerparty☀ 00:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Context speaking budgies
Hoax article. Was tagged with AfD, but this page was never created. The original AfD's link was changed to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan B. Reynolds (that deletion debate never made it into the logs). Wkdewey 14:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I have retagged Ryan B. Reynolds and Victor (budgerigar) to be included in this deletion vote as the afd process was not properly completed in these related articles as well. Bige1977 15:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all as hoax articles. Move context speaking budgies to WP:BJODN Bige1977 15:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all There are no credible sources backing up his claims and he doesn't even allow verification. The New York Times article doesn't even mention the content of the article. --Fasten 19:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I wouldn't say that these were 'hoax articles' as such, rather articles about a claim that may be a hoax. Reynolds' claims have certainly been discussed in detail on serveral bird forums of which I am a member over the past few years. --Kurt Shaped Box 16:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- BJAODN the main article, delete the others. Stifle (talk) 21:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- DELETE (research style). article name "low quality usage of language". an other article links to here. this article is spooky and does not meet several wikipedia standards. probably they have misunderstood wikipedia as research BBS. their site looks acceptable. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:OR & low language quality. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 00:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- It is not a digital cemetery... Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.