Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consultationologist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 22:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Consultationologist

Consultationologist (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism and dicdef. (Disputed prod). -- RHaworth 19:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete- Per nom ChrisLamb 19:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per above - not a dictionary Corpx
• Delete: Unsourced neologism, dicdef, possibly made up in school one day, etc. MastCell ^Talk 20:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per everything said above. — Wenli 20:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Probably WP:NFT, and maybe WP:HOAX. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 20:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. JJL 21:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; only ghits are to Wikipedia. John Vandenberg 15:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.