Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constructions set

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move to Construction set. -- Jonel | Speak 03:10, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Constructions set

Tagged for speedy but not a candidate. Hmm... I would say this looks like a notable kind of toy so I will say keep, although construction set might be a better title. Sjakkalle (Check!) 1 July 2005 12:24 (UTC)

• Categorize. Take out the British spelling, and the article is a good start for the header for a category describing what are the criteria for being a construction toy. Almafeta 1 July 2005 12:49 (UTC)

Umm, I think the 'British' spelling in there is just plain misspelling Those random double letters have no place on this side of the pond, either!-Splash July 2, 2005 00:44 (UTC)

I assumed it was British because of the way American 'Math' is British 'Maths'. nn; Almafeta 3 July 2005 23:53 (UTC)

Ah, I see. IANALinguist, but I suspect we have the 's' because mathematics is always plural and Latin has a habit of indicating plurality in contractions (see e.g. LLB). Construction set on the other hand, would only have its plural right at the end, even in BE. -Splash July 4, 2005 00:07 (UTC)

• Redirect to construction set, which indeed is how the text itself refers to them; may be a simple typo in the title. Concept of the article seems fine. Dcarrano 1 July 2005 22:42 (UTC)
• Move to Construction set. -Splash July 2, 2005 00:44 (UTC)
• Cleanup by all means, then let's see if its a keeper or deletion candidate. This article is terribly written; no wonder it has been requested for deletion. [[206.72.11.46 4 July 2005 21:48 (UTC)]]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.