Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constructioner

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 23:52, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Constructioner

Advertising. Inter\^Echo 13:40, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, a bad article is not a reason for deleting it, it's a reason to send it to cleanup. I may consider changing my vote if there's another reason brought up. -Frazzydee|✍ 13:52, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and send for cleanup. Google returned 11,400 results. - Mailer Diablo 14:30, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete wikispam. Chris 15:13, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A software tool always gives lots of spam, but this doesnt make it notable. BTW, these thousands of google are in fact only 370 reports, mostly from various warez sites: try the last page in google report. Mikkalai 23:51, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 01:47, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Mikkalai. Radiant_* 09:08, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, promotional spam--nixie 10:01, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete spam on sight. —Korath (Talk) 01:53, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.