Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consolidated punk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was closed, given that all had votes on their own. Admins closing these votes should consider this at their discretion as well. - Mailer Diablo 00:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Consolidated punk voting

Since so many -punk articles have come up for AfD all at once, this is your one-stop-shop to vote for those you think should be kept and those you think should go.

• I think most of these articles are valid descriptions of genres, but they're titled under recently made up neologisms. I suggest that they be merged into some sort of a central article that discusses variations on -punk genres. As it is there's just too much punkcruft. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 17:13, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Alas, most of these are *cruft, but some aren't, so I think it has to go case by case. rodii 20:53, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• delete all I'm also adding my votes to the individual AfDs. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • FWIW, I didn't list them all together because a couple had actual content (dubious or not) while others didn't. Perhaps I should have listed all the 100% obvious ones together and separately listed only the ones I considered worth more debate? —Matthew Brown (T:C) 21:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all, please consider this attached to the below AFDs. Stifle 13:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.