Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Kennedy III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Waltontalk 18:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conrad Kennedy III

Conrad Kennedy III (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod removed by Kris Classic with the comment ”his time in ROH and other notable indy promotions should make him notable enough. Lack of info isn't a cause for delete”. Was prodded for being a non-notable wrestler. A few low card apperances for RoH isn’t enough to warrant notability, working for Border City Wrestling isn’t automatic cause for inclusion since the promotion itself is barely notable, no sources, fails WP:N and WP:V MPJ-DK 08:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO, as it is WP:NN and has no WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 13:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete — He is notable because he is a professional wrestler, but the there aren't any reliable sources to back the claims. *Cremepuff222* 00:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and add sources my reading of WP:BIO for athletes says that any professional wrestler is notable (if I'm wrong about that, someone with more wrestling knowledge please enlighten me). Plenty of Google news hits to verify that he is indeed a professional wrestler. Capmango 15:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep As a professional wrestler, he borderline satisfies WP:BIO for being a professional athlete. However, reliable sources should be added about him.--Kylohk 16:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. I tend to disagree with but nonetheless grudgingly accept the notion that being a professional athlete is a ticket to notability (the same deference is not afforded to published scientists). I came here to close this AFD, but opted to see if supporting material could be found to allow the article to be kept. I've added two references to the article that provide information on matches the wrestler has been engaged in; I'm not terribly happy with the quality of the references, but they are there nonetheless. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.