Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congressional staff edits of Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasSpeedy deleted at request of author and attempt to communicate. Capitalistroadster 23:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Congressional staff edits of Wikipedia

Article was prodded because "This is an opinion/essay, not a neutral encyclopedic article, see also WP:NOT". Moved to AfD to allow for consensus on what might be a controversial topic. No vote for now. youngamerican (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Should probably be speedied, maybe as an A1 or A3. --Aaron 16:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as non-article attempt to start a forum. I could have sworn there was a speedy for articles that are an attempt to communicate with others or solicit information.--Isotope23 17:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOT a discussion forum. Weregerbil 18:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to WP:Requests for comment/United States Congress. Alba 21:59, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I created this article before I googled and found there was already a page for said subject, why not spedy it. Nmpenguin 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 23:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.