Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congaplex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Congaplex

WP:OR - author's experience plus broken link to producer of Congaplex KarenAnn 13:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - I just put up my experiences as a stub, hoping that someone with a pharm. background would see the stub and add some quality material. At that time there wasn't any research on the internet that I could cite. David Bergan 14:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Pretty much the definition of original research. No prejudice towards using the word "Congaplex" more often in everyday language though. Wickethewok 15:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as per Wickethewok's comments, this is blatantly WP:OR. Scorpiondollprincess 16:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The Gecko 12:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:OR Massmato 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.