Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conflict of Arda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict of Arda

Article gives no indication of satisfiying WP:SOFTWARE, WP:V, or WP:RS Whispering(talk/c) 12:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, I see no case for deletion here: WP:SOFTWARE is merely a proposed guideline, the article is sourced (and even it weren't, then it would only require sourcing, not deletion) and the links provided certainly do not fail WP:RS, since they include respectable gamesites. Please stick to Wikipedia:deletion policy for reasons that are ground for deletion. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment "Well, it only requires sourcing" ignores the fact that oftentimes sourcing is asked for and people never give them until the article is in danger of deletion (and sometimes never give them at all, because there aren't any). But in any case, unless Planet Annihilation wrote an review of this mod, it hasn't said anything about the mod, it just gave a link for download. That's not sourcing - all of the information from the article still came from the author's own keyboard. ColourBurst 00:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Although still do not think that lack of sourcing is a reason for deletion (if no sources exist at all, that can be reason for deletion of course). I had a closer look and admit that I was not able to find any information in secondary sources for this game. That means indeed that sourcing will be very difficult, therefore I striked my vote for this AfD. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 07:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, advertisement, nn game mod. Recury 13:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - No reliable sources. No idea what "respectable gamesites" Reinoutr is referring to - he just seems to be copying/pasting all his AFD responses... Wickethewok 16:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh please, of course it is partly copy/pasted, like are all these nominations. The nominations don't even try to give reasoning for specific articles, just a few calls to a couple of wiki-talk abbreviations. If you would have looked more careful, you would have noticed I actually adjusted my votes for each AfD I voted on (which certainly is not every game-related AfD, just the ones I happened to stumble upon and that have my interest), to fit that particular AfD. And to answer your question: planet annihilation (although no longer updated) is part of Gamespy [1]. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 20:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete no reliable sources, nothing to set it apart from the thousands of other game mods out there. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable, and reads more like an ad than an article. The Kinslayer 08:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.