Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Configura Sverige

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 01:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Configura Sverige

Configura Sverige (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Blatant advertising. Only contributors are the article creator and anons. Been tagged for notability and references since January. Raven in Orbit (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. I added a newspaper article from the Grand Rapids Press as a reference. I think notability is more or less established now. The article still isn't very exciting. The corresponding Swedish article sv:Configura Sverige was deleted on March 12, 2008 by sv:Användare:Wanpe with the reason: "Efter behandling på WP:Sidor föreslagna för radering" --Eastmain (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. In our voting it was a clear vote for deltete for two reasons. The company was just on the border of being as big and significant as we want to see but most important the article was part of a promotion attempt where this article was part of several. And the content is too promotional, not neutral enough. Wanpe (talk) 06:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete - Notability is obscured by blatant advertising. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Ecoleetage. Stifle (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete It seems this article exists to improve its subject, instead of improving the pedia. BusterD (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.