Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coney Hall

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Paul August ☎ 04:45, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Coney Hall

Not notable, not encyclopedic, not clear, not anything, really. TheMadBaron 09:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - I've cleaned it up to a sensible regional stub. Tearlach 11:33, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep now that the nonsense is gone. Punkmorten 21:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep reasonable notability. — Phil Welch 22:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Despite the obvious need for expansion, one reason to keep it is that suburbia and suburbs are of great importance in social history Jezze 00:28, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - this is the site of a semi-famous event in British modern history, and certainly one of the interesting events in social development of the 20th century. The article may be bad, but it's a stub at the worst. Maury 17:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.