Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computing analogies

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 10:00, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Computing analogies

Original research. --SPUI (talk) 22:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Rather painful original research. --MarkSweep 23:04, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research indeed. Eek. Wyss 00:33, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unsalvageable original research. gag. -- Cleduc 00:49, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Rhobite 03:27, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Ouch! Original, but I think to call it 'research' is pushing it. Delete Treborbassett 15:40, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nice try, but it's original text, and not very enlightening. Kim Bruning 00:32, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this for educational purposes for other Wikipedians. --GoofyGuy 02:54, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's overly generous to call this "research". older≠wiser 17:47, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.